Wednesday, December 31, 2008
At Least He's Really Tall
There are rumors going around that the O's are interested in bringing in Richie Sexson to play first base. Just doing some quick calculus, Sexson might give you a league average bat (if you're lucky) so that's +0 wins. He plays a bad (generously -.75 wins) first base (-1.25 wins). At 500 PA that's a 0.4 WAR player with no upside and plenty of downside. He might not want even the $2 M or so he'd earn at that rate of production, but why bother? Go for the upside and let Nolan Reimold play first. He probably starts at 0 WAR but might give you 1 or even 2. Or put him in left and let Luke Scott man first. I really hope that MacPhail has more sense than this, because such a move would be pointless and really irritating to even minimally knowledgeable fans. There is the off-chance that Gary Thorne actually learns his name though, and stops calling him Richie Sexton. I guess in the grand scheme of things, that's a plus.
Read more ...
Others' Projections
Just like last year, ReplacementLevel.com (a Yankee blog) has some projected standings for the AL East (though they are preliminary).
He has the O's offense putting up a .267/.336/.422 line compared to my .275/.341/.425. That's 779 runs scored to 791. He also has the O's pitching staff putting up a 4.80 ERA with a 4.92 FIP and giving up 832 runs, while I have them with a 5.07 tRA (5.42 for starters and 4.59 for relievers) and giving up about 811 (different scales, I know).
That means his O's have a Pythagorean record of 76-86, but then he makes an adjustment to all of the teams for being in the AL East and having to play each other more. After that, the O's lose 5 wins to go to 71-91.
The final standings, by the way, where:
NYY - 96
BOS - 94
TBR - 90
TOR - 75
BAL - 71
Last year pretty much everyone was low on the O's win totals, and even those that got the 68 wins were off because they had that as the Pythagorean record whereas the Orioles RS/RA implied they should have won 73 games. I was higher on Nick Markakis than almost all projections, and he still managed to exceed my expectations for total production (lower SLG, much higher OBP). This year I'm once again on the high end for him as well as the team as a whole. We'll see how it turns out. The AL East adjustment is interesting - even though I already started things off 5 wins lower than I understand it should be, I'll probably knock off a couple more for the final guess. Read more ...
He has the O's offense putting up a .267/.336/.422 line compared to my .275/.341/.425. That's 779 runs scored to 791. He also has the O's pitching staff putting up a 4.80 ERA with a 4.92 FIP and giving up 832 runs, while I have them with a 5.07 tRA (5.42 for starters and 4.59 for relievers) and giving up about 811 (different scales, I know).
That means his O's have a Pythagorean record of 76-86, but then he makes an adjustment to all of the teams for being in the AL East and having to play each other more. After that, the O's lose 5 wins to go to 71-91.
The final standings, by the way, where:
NYY - 96
BOS - 94
TBR - 90
TOR - 75
BAL - 71
Last year pretty much everyone was low on the O's win totals, and even those that got the 68 wins were off because they had that as the Pythagorean record whereas the Orioles RS/RA implied they should have won 73 games. I was higher on Nick Markakis than almost all projections, and he still managed to exceed my expectations for total production (lower SLG, much higher OBP). This year I'm once again on the high end for him as well as the team as a whole. We'll see how it turns out. The AL East adjustment is interesting - even though I already started things off 5 wins lower than I understand it should be, I'll probably knock off a couple more for the final guess. Read more ...
Tuesday, December 30, 2008
Modest Improvements
I have the O's projected at about 78 wins right now, which seems pretty high (I went back and added a couple of players that I originally missed and gave more plate appearances to the bench (at worse production, though with improved defense to keep them at 0 WAR) at the expense of the starters - I didn't want to be overly optimistic about the run scoring. Plus, it seems like Hendrickson will be a long-reliever/spot starter so his innings and replacement level had to be adjusted accordingly). They only won 68 games last year, but had a Pythagorean record with 73 wins (and about the same number from 45 + team WAR - theoretically it should be more like 50 as the starting point, but I made it lower since the AL East is such a tough division). Where have those extra 6 wins come from?
* Upgrade at catcher. Wieters should at the very least be better than Ramon was behind the plate. I also think that while Razor was below average with the bat last year, Wieters will be a bit above average. Add in a competent back-up/starter for the first month (*cough* Gregg Zaun *cough*) instead of replacement level players like Guillermo Quiroz (who I still like) Omir Santos, and the catcher position should see a one win improvement (at least) for 2009.
* Upgrade at first base. Kevin Millar was a replacement level player in 2008. Oscar Salazar (or whoever) isn't exactly Mark Teixeira, but he should be an above replacement (if below average) player over there. A half win or so.
* Luke Scott not having to split time with a replacement level player in left (so long, Jay Payton) is a plus. I think he'll hit better too. Tack on another half-win.
* Adam Jones' bat becomes only a little below average and he doesn't get injured (hopefully). Half win addition.
* Finally the big one - shortstop. Six Orioles' shortstops combined to be horribly below replacement last year, with Juan Castro being the worst offender (though only because he got the most playing time). It is unbelievable to me that the team could go through that many players and have them all be below replacement. There had to be someone freely available that could have sucked less. Cesar Izturis isn't a world-beater, but his modest 1 WAR talent is actually a 4 WAR improvement from last year's mess.
* Roberts, Mora, and Huff will all likely decline, but improvement with the pitching staff will hopefully make up for all of that. There will be some regression for a couple of guys (mainly Jim Johnson), but regression in the positive direction from Garrett Olson, Radhames Liz, Jamie Walker, and some others should more than counteract that. Call it a half-win loss to be conservative.
Will the Orioles really win 78 games next year? Probably not, but that doesn't mean they can't. Their position players are good enough to repeat their 68 wins from 2008 with even a replacement level pitching staff, so it'll be the pitchers that determine how far they go. Read more ...
* Upgrade at catcher. Wieters should at the very least be better than Ramon was behind the plate. I also think that while Razor was below average with the bat last year, Wieters will be a bit above average. Add in a competent back-up/starter for the first month (*cough* Gregg Zaun *cough*) instead of replacement level players like Guillermo Quiroz (who I still like) Omir Santos, and the catcher position should see a one win improvement (at least) for 2009.
* Upgrade at first base. Kevin Millar was a replacement level player in 2008. Oscar Salazar (or whoever) isn't exactly Mark Teixeira, but he should be an above replacement (if below average) player over there. A half win or so.
* Luke Scott not having to split time with a replacement level player in left (so long, Jay Payton) is a plus. I think he'll hit better too. Tack on another half-win.
* Adam Jones' bat becomes only a little below average and he doesn't get injured (hopefully). Half win addition.
* Finally the big one - shortstop. Six Orioles' shortstops combined to be horribly below replacement last year, with Juan Castro being the worst offender (though only because he got the most playing time). It is unbelievable to me that the team could go through that many players and have them all be below replacement. There had to be someone freely available that could have sucked less. Cesar Izturis isn't a world-beater, but his modest 1 WAR talent is actually a 4 WAR improvement from last year's mess.
* Roberts, Mora, and Huff will all likely decline, but improvement with the pitching staff will hopefully make up for all of that. There will be some regression for a couple of guys (mainly Jim Johnson), but regression in the positive direction from Garrett Olson, Radhames Liz, Jamie Walker, and some others should more than counteract that. Call it a half-win loss to be conservative.
Will the Orioles really win 78 games next year? Probably not, but that doesn't mean they can't. Their position players are good enough to repeat their 68 wins from 2008 with even a replacement level pitching staff, so it'll be the pitchers that determine how far they go. Read more ...
Monday, December 29, 2008
WAR Update
With a couple of new additions (Cesar Izturis and 6'9" lefty pitcher Mark Hendrickson) it's time for updated 2009 WAR projections.
Offense:
Position Players:
Pitchers:
Total Team WAR (assuming 45 wins for a replacement level team): 78.3 Read more ...
Offense:
Player | PA | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | BA | OBP | SLG | wOBA |
Matt Weiters | 400 | 99 | 21 | 1 | 12 | 36 | .273 | .339 | .436 | .340 |
Oscar Salazar | 450 | 111 | 21 | 1 | 15 | 44 | .274 | .346 | .443 | .349 |
Brian Roberts | 625 | 158 | 40 | 5 | 9 | 69 | .285 | .365 | .425 | .358 |
Melvin Mora | 550 | 137 | 24 | 1 | 17 | 46 | .273 | .335 | .426 | .341 |
Cesar Izturis | 550 | 135 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 37 | .264 | .314 | .329 | .293 |
Luke Scott | 575 | 136 | 35 | 3 | 24 | 59 | .265 | .341 | .485 | .360 |
Adam Jones | 575 | 145 | 31 | 2 | 15 | 41 | .273 | .325 | .423 | .331 |
Nick Markakis | 625 | 161 | 41 | 1 | 20 | 88 | .301 | .401 | .494 | .395 |
Aubrey Huff | 600 | 153 | 35 | 2 | 23 | 52 | .280 | .344 | .478 | .359 |
Luis Montanez | 200 | 53 | 12 | 1 | 5 | 14 | .286 | .337 | .443 | .342 |
Ryan Freel | 350 | 87 | 16 | 1 | 3 | 30 | .273 | .336 | .358 | .323 |
Bench | 500 | 118 | 15 | 1 | 8 | 27 | .250 | .292 | .337 | .292 |
Total (Starters) | 4,950 | 1,235 | 268 | 18 | 138 | 472 | .277 | .347 | .438 | .349 |
Total (Team) | 6,000 | 1,493 | 311 | 21 | 154 | 543 | .275 | .341 | .425 | .342 |
Position Players:
Player | Pos. | 2008 wOBA | 2008 wOBA+ | 2009 "Proj." wOBA | 2009 "Proj." PA | Pos. Adj. | Def. | Bat (700 PA) | WAR | $WAR | Proj. Salary | Diff |
Matt Weiters | C | .458 (AA) | 134 | .340 | 400 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 0.1 | 2.2 | $10.9 | $0.4 | $10.5 |
Oscar Salazar | 1B | .394 | 116 | .349 | 450 | -1.25 | 0.00 | 0.6 | 1.2 | $6.1 | $0.4 | $5.7 |
Brian Roberts | 2B | .374 | 112 | .358 | 625 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 1.1 | 3.4 | $17.0 | $8.0 | $9.0 |
Melvin Mora | 3B | .364 | 108 | .341 | 550 | 0.25 | -0.75 | 0.1 | 1.7 | $8.4 | $9.0 | -$0.6 |
Cesar Izturis | SS | .260 | 79 | .293 | 550 | 0.75 | 0.50 | -2.7 | 0.9 | $4.5 | $2.5 | $2.0 |
Luke Scott | LF | .356 | 106 | .360 | 575 | -0.75 | 0.25 | 1.2 | 2.6 | $13.2 | $1.0 | $12.2 |
Adam Jones | CF | .322 | 96 | .331 | 575 | 0.25 | 0.75 | -0.5 | 2.5 | $12.5 | $0.4 | $12.1 |
Nick Markakis | RF | .398 | 119 | .395 | 625 | -0.75 | 0.50 | 3.2 | 4.9 | $24.2 | $7.0 | $17.2 |
Aubrey Huff | DH | .389 | 116 | .359 | 600 | -1.75 | 0.00 | 1.2 | 1.6 | $8.3 | $8.0 | $0.3 |
Luis Montanez | OF | .352 | 104 | .342 | 200 | -0.75 | 0.00 | 0.2 | 0.5 | $3.1 | $0.4 | $2.7 |
Ryan Freel | Util | .323 | 99 | .323 | 350 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.9 | 0.8 | $4.2 | $4.0 | $0.2 |
Bench | .292 | 500 | 0.00 | 0.25 | -2.7 | 0.0 | $0.5 | $0.4 | $0.1 | |||
Total | 22.3 | $112.9 | $41.5 | $71.4 |
Pitchers:
Player | Pos. | 2008 tRA | 2008 tRA+ | 2008 tRA* regressed | 2009 "Proj." tRA | 2009 "Proj." IP | WAR | $WAR | Proj. Salary | Diff |
Jeremy Guthrie | SP | 4.84 | 101 | 4.80 | 4.75 | 180 | 2.7 | $13.5 | $2.0 | $11.5 |
Garrett Olson | SP | 5.26 | 92 | 5.26 | 5.25 | 160 | 1.5 | $7.7 | $0.4 | $7.3 |
Radhames Liz | SP | 6.86 | 59 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 120 | 0.1 | $1.0 | $0.4 | $0.6 |
Chris Waters | SP | 5.84 | 80 | 5.16 | 5.75 | 100 | 0.4 | $2.3 | $0.4 | $1.9 |
Hayden Penn | SP | 5.80 (AAA) | 80 (AAA) | 5.12 (AAA) | 6.00 | 100 | 0.1 | $0.9 | $0.4 | $0.5 |
Matt Albers | SP/RP (67-33) | 3.08 / 4.59 | 137 / 97 | 4.84 / 4.67 | 4.75 | 120 | 1.4 | $7.2 | $0.4 | $6.8 |
Mark Hendrickson | SP/RP (50-50) | 5.53 / 4.22 | 84 / 105 | 5.15 / 4.58 | 5.00 | 100 | 0.7 | $3.9 | $4.0 | -$0.1 |
Brian Burres | SP/RP (50-50) | 6.20 / 5.94 | 73 / 74 | 5.95 / 4.65 | 5.75 | 100 | -0.1 | -$0.1 | $0.4 | -$0.5 |
George Sherrill | RP | 4.07 | 109 | 4.35 | 4.00 | 60 | 0.9 | $4.8 | $2.0 | $2.8 |
Jim Johnson | RP | 3.48 | 122 | 4.14 | 4.00 | 70 | 1.0 | $5.3 | $0.4 | $4.9 |
Chris Ray | RP | 4.30 (2007) | 108 (2007) | 4.24 (2007) | 4.50 | 50 | 0.4 | $2.1 | $0.5 | $1.6 |
Dennis Sarfate | RP | 4.23 | 105 | 4.53 | 4.50 | 60 | 0.5 | $2.7 | $0.4 | $2.3 |
Alberto Castillo | RP | 4.47 | 100 | 4.40 | 4.50 | 40 | 0.3 | $1.9 | $0.4 | $1.5 |
Jamie Walker | RP | 6.83 | 47 | 5.19 | 5.00 | 40 | 0.1 | $0.8 | $4.5 | -$3.7 |
Kam Mickolio | RP | 3.91 | 113 | 4.49 | 4.50 | 40 | 0.3 | $1.9 | $0.4 | $1.5 |
Randor Bierd | RP | 5.23 | 83 | 5.13 | 5.00 | 35 | 0.2 | $1.2 | $0.4 | $0.8 |
Danys Baez | RP | 7.04 (2007) | 50 (2007) | 5.68 (2007) | 5.00 | 35 | 0.2 | $1.2 | $5.5 | -$4.3 |
Jim Miller | RP | 3.26 | 127 | 4.45 | 4.50 | 30 | 0.3 | $1.7 | $0.4 | $1.3 |
Total | 5.07 | 1440 | 10.9 | $60.0 | $23.3 | $36.7 |
Total Team WAR (assuming 45 wins for a replacement level team): 78.3 Read more ...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)