Showing posts with label Joe Morgan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joe Morgan. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Joe Ramblings

Rick Maese had an interesting article up at the Baltimore Sun. It was about a comment Joe Morgan made in one of his chats regarding the Orioles.
"Brian in College Park wanted Joe's opinion on the Orioles. He noted how the Orioles are stockpiling prospects but also playing above expectations this season. "What do you see the O's doing in the next few years?" Brian in College Park asked.

Here's how Morgan responded (and I'm not making up any of this): "My suggestion would be to use some of those minor leaguers to get big league help. You build your minor league system to help your big league system...
If you can bring some of them up, fine, but if you can trade them for a major league player who is playing well, do so...
It's what the Brewers did with CC Sabathia."
Maese goes on to discuss how this is not the correct path the club should take. His points are largely valid (except when he says the club should he happy to shed Huff's contract - I think that Huff (18 HR, 53 RBI already and he usually improves in the second half) shouldn't just be discarded; he won't bring back a LaPorta or a Gallagher, but maybe an Eric Patterson? That's still valuable.). That main thing I want to say is that Rick is taking Joe a little too seriously. He seems to think that Joe is a bad analyst, when in actuality, he isn't an analyst at all (when it comes to things like this). I doubt Joe can tell you anything about more than 5 Orioles off the top of his head. He has no idea what their farm system is like, where they are on the contention curve, or even any suggestions as to who they should trade for. It's really just par for the course with him. It's not even that amusing.

As to the "I'm not making up any of this", well, that's pretty obvious. Let's try to make up a more classic Joe Morgan answer to the question. I guess it should contain all or some of the following:

(1) "Consistency"
(2) "Concetration"
(3) No more great teams
(4) Gary Sheffield is awesome
(5) Starting pitching is really important
(6) It's too early to tell / anything can happen
(7) Not answering all or part of the question
(8a) Not having any specific knowledge about the situation
(8b) "I haven't seen enough of them/him to tell"
(9) "I don't like talking about the Hall of Fame" and then talking about the Hall of Fame

So, "Emmy award winning baseball analyst Joe Morgan," what do you see the O's doing in the next few years, given that they are stockpiling prospects and have been playing above expectations?

"There aren't any more great teams in baseball (3) so the Orioles have a chance. I haven't seen enough of them to tell (8b), but I don't think they have the consistancy (1) to catch the Red Sox or Yankees (8a), but there is still a lot of baseball to be played (6)." (7) Also, bonus points for the poorly put together sentence and the miss-spelled "consistency".

At least it wasn't as wrong as what he actually said, even if it sounds stupider.

I don't know if this is from the last chat I read excerpts from, but I actually know what is going on with Joe.
"sean (levittown, PA): I think the Phillies should get another starting pitcher like C.C. Sabathia. What do you think?

Joe Morgan: Well I think every team needs another starting pitcher, it's not like the Phillies are the only ones. But they do need anothe rpitchers. Starting piutching is still the No. 1 commoodity in the game and there is still a shortage of top-notch starting pitching in MLB."
Maybe it's a bad keyboard, because there were a bunch of typos.
"Joe Chicago: If the white sox do make a trade what and who should they go for?

Joe Morgan: They need more consistent hitting. Dye is swinging the bat well, as is Crede, but everyone else has been streaky. Thome jhas not been concistent and neither was Konerko before he got hurt. That is what Ozzie went off about, the incosistent offense. They need offense."
It's like Joe's become a characature of himself.
"Matt (Oconomowoc): Ben Sheets has been consistently great this year. Do you think the Brewers will be able to lock him up long term?

Joe Morgan: It depends on what they want to spend, and if they are worried about the inuuries. But last night he looked great. Because of injuries, he has not been able to come close to 20 wins, and he has had physical problems, so it comes down to how confident they are about hi health. But having said that, they need to keep him, because when healthy he is a great pitcher."
It's absurd to me that Joe might not actually realize that people are baiting him. If he's asked 25 questions a week, and 5-10 use the word "consistent", shouldn't that raise a red flag? It's as if "consistency" is the most important thing to Joe - he uses it repeatedly and maybe just assumes others value it as highly as he does.

I've developed a possible theory about the whole situation, and it goes like this:

* Joe Morgan was one of the first proponents of the importance of walks and OBP, so he's not a really dumb guy.
* Joe, while doing these chats, decided that it would be much easier for him to give poor answers with the same things repeated over and over again, instead of dong actual research or analysis.
* Joe partially believes the things he says, but knows they aren't particularly good answers.
* Between last year and this year, Joe found FireJoeMorgan.com and the full extent to which people make fun of him online.
* Joe decided to actually, you know, be an analyst this year. That'll show 'em.

* We see things like:
- "Doug (Cincinnati) Joe, What is your take on the Reds this year? Do you think they can make a run for the playoffs?

Joe Morgan: It's too early for anyone to panic in Detroit, or for people to start printing playoff tickets in Cincinnati. I like what I've seen there, and with Cueto, Volquez, Harang, and Arroyo pitching well, they have the potential to be a playoff team. It'll depend on the young pitchers. "

- "casey (san francisco, CA): As a diehard sf giants fan (and a frustrated one) i realize that the franchise is, to simply put it, a mess. What do you suggest the management do to turn things around in the bay, no matter how long it takes?

Joe Morgan: It's not going to be an overnight fix. The offense is a mess and the pitching may be as well. They have put a lot of pressure on Cain and Lincecum. Barry Zito is not the Barry Zito of old, and the pressure on their young pitchers will show. Their offense is just--I don't know where they will score runs. Their two most productive hitters--Bonds and Feliz--are gone. It's going to take a long time before the Giants are a contender in the West."
There was of course that time he talked about Hanley Ramirez possibly being the best player in the league and that "If you use statistics, last year he was the most productive player in the league." Ramirez led the league in VORP in 2007, but no other major statistical categories.

That was in his first week back chatting in 2008, and while it wasn't a Baseball Prospectus chat or anything, it wasn't bad.
- "Randy(Knoxville,TN): Good morning Joe!! My question for you is about Alfonso Soriano...what are your thoughts on him as the lead-off man for the Cub offense? While he can provide instant offense with the long ball, he also strikes out a bunch and doesnt draw many walks. Last year he struck out 99 more times than he drew a walk(130 K's vs 31 BB). I love him as a hitter, but not at the top. What do you think?Thanks, Joe.

Joe Morgan: I have never felt like he should be a leadoff hitter, but both Torre and Piniella used him there because he felt more comfortable. But if I'm paying a guy millions of dollars, I'm going to hit him where he can serve the team the best. His on-base percentage is not where a good leadoff hitter's should be at."

- "SprungOnSports (Long Island): With Randy Johnson putting out a good start, and Webb and Haren making a great 1-2 how much do you like the Diamondbacks right now?

Joe Morgan: I was already a big fan of the D-backs before Johnson's outing, but you have to wait to see how he bounces back from this outing. But Johnson will not win or lose the division for them--they won it last year without him, and their young players are getting better. I like them even if Johnson doesn't pitch well. They were outscored by their opponents last year--that will not happen again this year. Justin Upton looks like the next Albert Pujols."
There were a few clunkers, but the chat was very un-"Joe" like. (1) through (9) were noticeably absent. It was very inconsistent with our previous Joe Morgan experience.

* Joe realizes that it's not that easy to actually answer questions and/or he decideds that the lack of humor he is bringing to the internet is bad.
* Joe goes back to being the Joe Morgan he was in 2007 - all the while considering it a kind of a prank he's pulling on FMJ and the like. He's in on the joke now and playing the part, maybe even a little too well (he seemed to answer a lot of questions in subsequent weeks that were JoeBait, just so he could do his "thing").

There isn't any real reason to think this is accurate, but I have a hard time thinking of other explanations. FMJ proposed a somewhat intelligent intern they dubbed "Bill Fremp" who was actually doing the typing for Joe (and filtering his answers), and that he was fired, allowing the "real" Joe to come back. Honestly, I have no idea. What was this post about again? Read more ...

Monday, April 14, 2008

Where Did You Go, Joe?

Something happened today that made me sad inside. Things started out very well - it was the year's first Joe Morgan chat on ESPN (Yaye!). It was supposed to be a glorious day - a day I've been anxiously awaiting for months. It all went wrong, however. Even though it was a Joe chat, but it wasn't Joe chatting.

When asked about the Tigers' struggles, he didn't once mention Gary Sheffield, concetration, or consistency. When asked about the Reds, he talked about their young pitching. He even mentioned them by name. Cueto, Volquez, Harang, and Arroyo. I think it's only 50-50 that the real Joe Morgan would know who Edison Volquez was if he were calling the game in which Volquez was pitching.

Here's the kicker - the 100% this can't be Joe Morgan moment. His opinion of the Marlins. Just to recap; last year when asked about the Marlins he said "I talked to Tony Perez and he said they have some good young players there." He didn't even have his own opinion of them. This year? "They've got possibly the best player in the league. I know a lot of people do not think that way. He can do everything, and can hit from power from shortstop. He's a special player...Ramirez gets better each year...The Marlins will be only as good as he is. His production will depend on how much other teams pitch to him. If you use statistics, last year he was the most productive player in the league." I'll repeat that last part because (as Lewis Black says) it bears repeating. "If you use statistics, last year he was the most productive player in the league." In what way was Hanley the most productive player in the league last year? Not batting average. Not home runs. Not stolen bases or runs or hits. Not doubles or triples or sacrifices. Not slugging percentage or OBP. The stat the Ramirez led the league in was VORP. Value Over Replacement Player. "Joe Morgan" basically noted that Hanley Ramirez lead the league in VORP. The world didn't explode...yet. I don't know what will happen if next week he says that he found Moneyball to be a very enlightening read, and that Michael Lewis did a good job writing it. For the sake of my amusement, I hope that the real Joe comes back soon. Read more ...

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

If Joe Knows, He Isn't Telling

One of the things that I am most excited about regarding the upcoming season is the start of more Joe Morgan chats on ESPN - they are a source of extreme amusement for me.

[I don't hate Joe Morgan. I think that some of the things he says based on his intimate knowledge and experience with the game are very interesting. It's just that a lot of the other stuff he says is kind of dumb. I will admit that he was one of (if not #1) the top second basemen of all time. He also was a proponent of the importance of getting on base before it became "hip".]

Let's remember the good times, with "Joe Says" 2007 edition:
[Keep this quote in mind: "I'm just like every other fan - I watch every game. I check the box scores and check the stats like everyone else. I'm as interested in the Kansas City Royals as I am the Yankees or Red Sox. I'm a baseball fan. I just like to watch everybody."
Also keep in mind that this man has won awards for his broadcasting.]

Joe not making a statement he'll stand behind / not answering an asked question:

(On the Mets' chances of winning the division)
"I expect them to win the division...But that's why they play the games. No one knows for sure."

(On Ken Griffey Jr.'s legacy)
"He'll be elected into the Hall of Fame. He's one of the greatest players in the history of the game...
difficult question to answer...I'm not sure what his legacy will be."

(Will A-Rod win the MVP?)
"This year, I'm not sure. There is so much riding on every pitch, every at bat, every ground ball he fields, I'm not sure how he'll react. I think we'll have to wait at least a month into the season before we get a reading."

(On Derek Jeter's defense)
"I won't say someone's overrated because I don't see him every day."

(On the Tigers' chances of winning the division)
"I actually feel like Detroit might win the American League again. Obviously it's early, so I can't make a real prediction."

(On Roger Clemens signing somewhere)
"I know Roger pretty well, but I'm not going to predict what he will do."

(Who will win the AL West?)
"If Vladimir has another great year, I think the Angels will win... A's are very close... My darkhorse in that division are the other two - Mariners and Texas. I think either one could get hot and win." [So the answer is: someone who plays in the AL West. Very true.]

(Will the Indians win the AL Central?)
"There will be a lot of teams involved in deciding who goes to the playoffs this year."

(What's wrong with Bobby Abreu?)
"I don't see him enough to make that evaluation"

(Can Colorado have a .500 record?)
"They have a chance of being a good team...this may get them to a level above .500."

(What's wrong with Grady Sizemore?)
"I haven't seen enough of him this year to give a real good opinion."

(Who plays for the Yankees if Jeter gets hurt?)
"Jeter's the captain of the team...If you take anyone out, they'll suffer. It will depend on who plays SS in his stead."

(Can A-Rod keep hitting HR like he has?)
"Pitching is the key...You can only outscore the average teams....But the Yankees need him in order to have a good year."

(How good are the Marlins / Who's their closer?)
"I think they should be better anyway...I talked to Tony Perez and he said they have some good young players there."

(Does Felix Hernandez have a shot at the Cy Young?)
"Dwight Gooden is the best young pitcher I've ever seen. He was better than all of them at a young age."

(Were the Cardinals the worst World Series champs ever?)
"I can't answer if they're the worst ever, because I didn't see all of the others that didn't win."

(What are you looking forward to seeing this season?)
"I'm looking forward to a lot of teams playing well and a lot of players playing well...Then watching teams perform...I just look forward to all the things that can happen during the season."

(How can the Reds turn things around?)
"things haven't gone well the last two weeks, so they'll need to straighten it out."

(Is Sam Perlozzo in trouble?)
"It's tough for me to answer that question from afar, because I don't see how they go about their business on a day-to-day basis."

(How good can Phil Hughes be?)
"I don't know how good he can be, since he hasn't pitched enough games."

(Do you think the Yankees players are mad about Clemens' special contract clauses?)
"I can't answer that because I don't know what they think individually."

("Joe, I know it is still very early in the season, but does it appear the AL Central is developing into a 2 team race?")
"It's early is the proper answer, and I believe it is going to be at least a four team race before it is over." [Out of 5 teams.]

(Who (pitcher) do you think the Mets will trade for?)
"You always need some pitching. But I cannot say who they will get."

(Can the Dodgers contend?)
"Well everyone can use an extra bat or pitcher."

(What's wrong with the White Sox?)
"I'm not close enough to the situation to put my finger on the exact cause."

(Can the Reds contend?)
"That's a very good question. I don't think I'm equipped to answer that question. But it's a very good question, because I've been asking myself the same question. I'm not as close to the situation as I have been or should be, but I've talked to the owner and he wants to win."

(Should Boston trade for Mark Beurhle?)
"I have no idea where he's going"

(What could the Mariners get for Ichiro?)
"I really do not know"

(What kind of trades will the Reds make?)
"I am not sure what they will do."

(Any ideas to improve inter-league play?)
"Not really."

(Do you think Teixeira will be traded?)
"I am not sure he will be traded."

(Can the Tigers make a run at the World Series?)
"That is hard to say because you never know who is going to step up. "

(Could Tony Gwynn have hit .400 in 1994?)
"Well that is very hard to answer."

("In your opinion, who is the best hitter in baseball?...And defend your position.") [Doesn't he know who he's dealing with?]
"Well hitting is hard to define... But that is a very hard question to answer, because first you have to define what you think a good hitter is."

(What's in store for the Cardinals next year?)
"I don't know"

(Will the Tigers pass the Mariners to make the playoffs?)
"Well I think everyone has a chance right now...We are in a situation where there are a lot of teams that have a chance."

("How do you see the NL Central shaping up?")
"Like everyone else, I have no idea who will win."

(What's up with Eric Gagne?)
"I can't answer what's up with him"

(What are the chances that the DBacks make a big deal (like for Sanatana)?)
"That's out of my realm."

(What could/should the Red Sox give up for Jermaine Dye?)
"I have no idea what they'd have to give up for him"

(Who would you rather have, Roger Clemens or Randy Johnson?)
"I could cop out a little bit by saying it depends on the team I'm on...You can't go wrong picking either one."

(Who wins the NL West?)
"Well I do not have a crystal ball."

("And the World Series Teams are? And the winner is?")
"I don't have any predictions, because there are too many variables. There aren't many great teams out there. Every team has a weakness. We'll see which team's strengths show up."


Joe makes no sense:

("Do grittier players like David Eckstein do better in the cold weather?")
[I assume this is a joke question. Pretty funny.]
"No. I don't think there's any specific type of player that will play better in the colder weather... I think the player that can focus better will do better in the adverse weather." [That's a direct contradiction there.]

(How important are managers?)
"I think you have to have playoff type players before you can make the players."

(Impact rookies?)
"Dice-K is considered a rookie, but I don't buy that... if I had to pick an actual rookie, I'd have to say Dice-K."

(Can the Brewers recreate what the Tigers did last year and reach the post-season?)
"I think they can reach the post-season, but I do not know if they can recreate what the Tigers did last year."

[This one's in this section because of the Angelos comment.]
(What can the O's do to be better?)
"I'm not as caught up on the owner being the problem there." [!!! - That's also his whole answer, pretty much.]

(Can Colorado keep winning?)
"The Rockies seem to be manipulating the balls in their stadium--one day it's 13-1, and one day it's 1-0."

("Does it help [Holliday] that he plays three series here a year?) [HR Durby. This wasn't in an ESPN chat, but it is still worth mentioning.]
"No, I don't think so. This is a home-run-hitting contest, not a... place where you get accustomed to the view, and so forth."

(Can Seattle make the playoffs?)
"As I have tried to point out, starting pitching is still the most important part of pitching"

(Does Cleveland need to win the next two games vs Detroit?)
"You expect to win those games when you have Sabathia in the first game."

(Who wins NL MVP?)
"The MVP award doesn't say "most valuable on a winning team", it says "most valuable". I will contradict myself here by saying that if the Phillies make the playoffs, I would pick Rollins, and if the Brewers do so, I would pick Prince Fielder."


Joe mentions "consistency":

" Mauer will be consistent."

"Ortiz... hasn't been consistent."

"I'm not convinced they're (Boston) going to be consistent."

"The Indians need to be more consistent."

"They (Atlanta) haven't proven they'll be consistent

"He's (Adam Dunn) not a consistent hitter"

"He (Renteria) is very consistent."

"The Angels, if their pitching doesn't stay consistent, will not have the power to be the best team in the AL."

"Their (Yankees) offense isn't consistent... It's a lack of consistent play."

"Good teams have consistency."

"Reyes, Beltran, Castillo, Delgado, Wright and Alou are a little more consistent when they are all healthy."

"I think the Yankees are like three or four other teams, but can they stay consistent."

"He's (Vlad Guerrero) the only consistent power hitter on that team."

"It's a long season, you can't stay consistent for that long."

"He's (Moises Alou) the most consistent hitter on that ballclub."

"Milwaukee has not been consistent."

"They have a chance, but these teams need to get more consistent and right now none of the Wild Card teams are consistent."

"But again, everyone else (Tigers not named Sheffield) is inconsistent as well, so it is hard to tell."

"Peavy has been the most consistent"

"I think they (Brewers) can win it next year, but they need to be more consistent."

"The Rockies have more good hitters/consistent hitters than Cleveland."

"They (Astros) had no consistency in that lineup outside of Lee...They need to be able to score runs consistently."

"The one thing I have noticed is that I don't think the umpiring has been as consistent in these few games that I've seen. I'm not used to it being this inconsistent. The umpring has been a little erratic in the games that I've seen, though I have not seen each and every game. Even some of the calls on the bases have not been consistent." [That's three in four sentences.]


Misc.:

(On Derek Jeter's defense)
"Obviously, if he's won 3 consecutive Gold Gloves, he has to be pretty good."

(Are home/road records important?)
"It depends on how you play at the time... Regardless of where you're playing, if you play poorly you'll lose, and if you play well you'll win."

("Now that the always consistent Gary Sheffield is on the DL, do the Tigers -- even if they play the game the right way -- have a chance to make the playoffs? Or is it too early to tell?")
[This question just presses all of the right buttons with Joe. You've got "consistency", "Gary Sheffield" (who Joe loves), "playing the game the right way", and even gives him a usual out, "too early to tell". Bravo.]
The answer says that Sheffield is responsible for lifting them from 4th-5th in the league to 1st as a team. That's kind of silly on its own.

"But it comes down to the individual and his ability to concetrate. Right now the Mets are not concetrating"
"I do not see him everyday, but for him to be a superstar he needs to keep a high level of concetration, and some people seem to think he does not always concetrate as much as he should."
[Concetrate? This is in separate weeks.]

("I like Boston because they have the best run differential in baseball and their pitching top to bottom has been statistically the best all year. What do you think?")
"Well the run differential means nothing. It is like OPS, it mean nothing in the grander scheme of things."

(Prince Fielder in MVP discussion?)
"You are 100% correct. Today's my birthday and I am older and I went blank. I agree with you 100%."

("Joe -- can the Rockies overcome the 8 day layoff (and the snow)? Seems like it could be a challenge to bring the proper concetration and consistency, after their break.")
[Another great joke question, hitting both consistency and "concetration".]
"What they need is for two or three guys to step up in Boston to help the team get their timing back." [
What timing does the team have?]

(With Sheffield coming back, can Detroit win the Central in '08?)
"It is hard to say, but Detroit with Sheffield is a much better team. I think that is a very good question, but you never know in basbeall. A team may emerge out of nowhere."
[Loves Sheffield.. "you never know"..."a team may emerge out of nowhere". Nowhere is limited to Kansas City, Minnisota, and Chicago, by the way.]

(Todd Helton in the Hall of Fame?)
"You could answer the question yourself"
[There was more to it, but he didn't actually say yes or no, or give any reasons.]

("Mr, Morgan in your opinion what two teams will clash in the AL for the title? and why?")
["and why?" - is this guy on crack or something?]
"That's a very difficult question...Every team going in has a lot of ''ifs"...We'll just have to see who comes through."
[Joe Morgan's list of "opinions" is basically: there are no more great teams; everyone from the "Big Red Machine" should be in the HOF; Gary Sheffield is (still) one of the best hitters ever; Billy Beane wrote Moneyball, a book about how hitting home runs and walking is all that matters; consistency means the same thing as "good"; black managers (like Dusty Baker) are discriminated against.]

"I think the playoffs are going to be like the season - very unpredictable. Fun, but enjoyable to watch."

[I wish Joe held these chats daily. It's not like it would be hard for him. Or would it?]
Read more ...